Internet for peace Nobel prize 2010 for and against
Lewis Wallace at Wired (http://www.wired.com/underwire/author/lewis_wallace/) writes an article reporting Wired decision to start a campaign for candidating Internet (means each one of us being behind a PC) for Peace Nobel prize 2010 (full article at http://www.wired.com/underwire/2009/11/internet-for-peace-nobel/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+%28Wired%3A+Index+3+%28Top+Stories+2%29%29, candidate site at http://www.internetforpeace.it/manifesto.cfm).
I have contrasting feelings on this action.
Why I’m for.
- Because Internet is THE revolution of the last two centuries, having shortened distances, freed people and developed a common conscience
- Because Internet is a media of peace and of peace keeping, permitting people to share thoughts, frustrations, dreams, ideas, hopes
- Because the Nobel Prize for Peace can, finally, promote internet to a sort of new status of overnational media
Why I’m against.
- Internet is immaterial and, for itself, doesn’t deserve any merit, because are people underlying that make it a “good” or “bad” media
- Internet is not only peace. It has inside bad feelings and habits, like everyone of us.
- Because there are a lot of people more real than internet that deserve an help both as a prize and as money and associated visibility
At the very end, I decided to support the campaign because I hope, like Obama’s prize was this year, that this candidation will be a signal of hope for our world.
This post as a comment also at http://www.wired.com/underwire/2009/11/internet-for-peace-nobel/comment-page-1/#comment-41599